HOW TO LAND ON THE MOON - Smarter Every Day 250

Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days www.audible.com/smarter or TXT smarter to 500500
Click here if you're interested in subscribing: bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GET SMARTER SECTION
A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
www.aletro.org/
Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
www.apolloinrealtime.org/
I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
A special thank you to steveslater1987 for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tweet Ideas to me at:
smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
SmarterEveryDay
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
www.reddit.com/r/smartereveryday
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
www.ashellinthepit.com/
ashellinthepit.bandcamp.com/
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Warm Regards,
Destin

Ladata

Näkymät
1,286,064

Kommentteja

  • We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at www.patreon.com/smartereveryday . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

    SmarterEveryDaySmarterEveryDayUukausi sitten
    • Pshhhhh old news. I could land on the moon.

      Gavin AndStuffGavin AndStuffPäivä sitten
    • Yyhqara6 you

      adam philpadam philp2 päivää sitten
    • @MaGaO true, but the software to land reliably is fairly new and getting better all the time. Most of the failed Mars landings happened without the benefit of the sensors and algorithms available now. It's still best to train the pilots of course.

      AlmaadinAlmaadin4 päivää sitten
    • @Almaadin Many Mars probes have crashed. If humans are aboard, it makes sense to train them just in case.

      MaGaOMaGaO4 päivää sitten
    • @Almaadin that was done on earth..so gullible lol. Mars supposedly is 1% density of earth atmosphere. which means no air. an you need air to slow parachute and need air for lift when they eventually fly helicopter drone. so the impossible without air debunks your Mars landing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭😭

      hernan jimenezhernan jimenez4 päivää sitten
  • 1:45

    R ЯR Я5 tuntia sitten
  • "this video WERE SENDING LINCON TO THE MOON"

    Saran O.pSaran O.p9 tuntia sitten
  • So they essentially made a CNC machine that controls the craft?

    Sudeep RSudeep R11 tuntia sitten
  • NASA : Does all of this Some incel on the internet : "MoOn LaNdInG wAs FaKe!"

    Darth InsidiousDarth Insidious11 tuntia sitten
  • I’m looking forward to seeing more videos on returning to the moon. Especially to see what the engineers come up with for a test vehicle to fly here on earth.

    Michael CondonMichael Condon15 tuntia sitten
  • Nasa openly admits that humans cannot safely travel through the Van Allen Belts.... Yet this problem was solved in 1969-1972. What gives?

    John Doe p144.1John Doe p144.122 tuntia sitten
    • @Atlas OK, fair enough. What about the fact that Nasa "lost" over 13,000 reels of telemetry data. Also contributing to the official explanation as to why we haven't been back to the moon.

      John Doe p144.1John Doe p144.127 minuuttia sitten
    • @John Doe p144.1 Not really. The rocket used in the Apollo program is no longer manufactured. The last Saturn V was made nearly half a century ago. Can't send people beyond LEO without a a massive rocket.

      AtlasAtlas48 minuuttia sitten
    • @Atlas don’t you find it a bit peculiar that we could travel 238,000 miles into space(Apollo mission) but now the farthest we can send MAN into space is 1200 miles (Low Earth Orbit)?

      John Doe p144.1John Doe p144.1Tunti sitten
    • @John Doe p144.1 alright, just watched the videos.

      AtlasAtlas3 tuntia sitten
    • @John Doe p144.1 no

      AtlasAtlas3 tuntia sitten
  • The Plan is good! Hopefully it will happen soon! I would like to see human beings will be traveling to the Moon for their vacations and back to the earth! And then Human being will develop the advantage technologies to travel to other planets to live, working, vacation, ...... and back to the Mother Earth!

    chau dochau do23 tuntia sitten
  • I don't know about you.... but these prototype propulsion techniques, if they were ever snatched by the military and repurposed for military vehicles,.... and IF one, or some, if any, of those prototypes were seen by the public.... there's a really good chance they'd look like flying saucers, to the layman. think about it... 1964 era, middle of the space race, lots of UFO sightings, and now we know that NASA had a *FREAKING VTOL PROTOTYPE* ?!?!?!??!

    NighthawkNighthawkPäivä sitten
  • The immense drawbridge laparoscopically kill because submarine coincidentally jail above a tame parent. big, moldy slice

    Chris GonzalezChris GonzalezPäivä sitten
  • Am I missing something here? Why wouldn't they try to evenly fill the system with helium compartments or vacuum? Would that be beyond the limit of how much that volume could lift compared to the weight of the lunar lander?

    Zoltán KozmaZoltán KozmaPäivä sitten
  • Wayne is a national treasure. I love AMERICA!!!!!!!

    Travis JamesTravis JamesPäivä sitten
  • Among us??!!!

    DarpDarpPäivä sitten
  • My pal Jonathan Dimock works for NASA. He’s the man who speaks to the president re NASA biz. My pal Johnathan had zeroooo experience to have got this job....

    FILM N SHOOT COFILM N SHOOT COPäivä sitten
  • The X-14 is basically a copy of the British Hawker Siddeley P.1127. Which later became the Harrier Jump jet.

    The Revolution Will Not Be TelevisedThe Revolution Will Not Be TelevisedPäivä sitten
  • 1:44 sus

    Dwagin ConDwagin ConPäivä sitten
  • The lumpy gender phenomenologically request because plastic univariately grin through a acoustic grain. wiry, clammy magazine

    Vincent PangVincent PangPäivä sitten
  • How did they know the lunar gravitational force before going to the moon?

    Who FartedWho FartedPäivä sitten
  • Эти "проэкты"-возможность воровать общие деньги,играть во взрослые игрушки и не быть наказанным,а быть "уважаемыми космическими ворами" Я предпологаю.что верхушка США и СССР были в сговоре и много лет смеялись над доверчивыми гражданами...

    Ася ГумероваАся ГумероваPäivä sitten
  • We all see drones, and the amazing technology they use to fly straight, steady, and in some cases, autonomously. I'm sure there is a tie-in here.

    Chas WolfChas WolfPäivä sitten
  • Didnt the Harrier fly in 1967?

    Brandon RoutierBrandon RoutierPäivä sitten
  • What actually happens on the moon landing(s) low-key confirmed by his guest Ben Feist is that the Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) does all of the flying until final approach where Armstrong and other astronauts use the rate-of-decent mode (P66), a mode not unlike drones for the home market where the stabilization is handled by the AGC and Neil uses the fly by wire stick to control horizontal velocity, avoid a boulder field and then bring bring the horizontal velocity to zero; another two switches can speed up or slow down the computers rate of descent in increments of one foot per second. I know the LLTV also had a computer. How similar was it's stabilization and controls to the actual LEM and the AGC's P66?

    djmipsdjmipsPäivä sitten
  • Man, the engineer of the LLTV, what a treasure!

    el blanco _el blanco _Päivä sitten
  • 1:45 1:58

    Dylan Wager MusicDylan Wager MusicPäivä sitten
  • i dont want to be apart of this planet anymore

    Adam ArmstrongAdam Armstrong2 päivää sitten
  • 4:06 the the angle dynamically shook with his hands, now that's detail.

    TheEmeraldSwordTheEmeraldSword2 päivää sitten
  • This was an amazing video. Thank you. Understanding the why truly is as pertinent as the how. If you understand the why, then engineers can use updated techniques if possible instead of just repeating work arounds.

    Kerrie ArkwellKerrie Arkwell2 päivää sitten
  • The communists now in charge want nothing to do with moon landings anyway, so...

    Dan BertucciDan Bertucci2 päivää sitten
  • I don't even drink and I want the lunar shot glass

    SlayerofFictionSlayerofFiction2 päivää sitten
  • I really do not see the point. The next one will be landed by ai.

    Gert KrugerGert Kruger2 päivää sitten
  • amogus

    KatzRoolKatzRool2 päivää sitten
  • 4:30 "and if there were no drag.." If there were no drag then there would be no thrust/movement. Just like if there were no weight/gravity there would be no lift.

    DrCash7DrCash72 päivää sitten
  • Fek

    DrCash7DrCash72 päivää sitten
  • Would be quite impossible to control Starship HLS by hand. Will be autonomous.

    EphraimEphraim2 päivää sitten
  • NASA scientists shoulda just played Kerbal Space Program. I was landing on the Mun as a teenager.

    DhoulmegusDhoulmegus2 päivää sitten
  • Well done video, learned a lot, (like there are still people that think we didn’t go to the moon, and the earth is flat. I’m sure there are still those that think Hitler didn’t murder millions of people in death camps...) My question is, why go back to the moon? What’s there that we can benefit people? It will cost billions of dollars, tax dollars, just to say we can it? It’s a moon with ... not much on it. The distances to leave our solar system to anyway else are just too far away. Sorry, this isn’t Star Trek, or some other fantasy TV show... .

    strshooterstrshooter2 päivää sitten
  • Nah uh, they didn't "make sure velocity is zero when touching the surface". They had probes sticking out of lander which, when the probes touched the surface, automatically shut the engine down (while still some meters above the ground), so the lander gently dropped to the ground.

    maksphoto78maksphoto782 päivää sitten
  • 1:58 among us 🤑🤑🤙👌👍

    Doritos XDDoritos XD2 päivää sitten
  • Your questions and the way his eyes lit up. Surprised and also happy to see someone younger understanding his knowledge. Awesome

    Kevin PalmerKevin Palmer2 päivää sitten
  • Mr. Ottinger is SO COOL. Man, you just know he has countless other amazing stories.

    Spo8Spo83 päivää sitten
  • The wild patricia univariably influence because belief exemplarily sigh unlike a flashy comic. aromatic, lethal lyocell

    kkcsak ndclonkkcsak ndclon3 päivää sitten
  • Please do a video on the X-14

    OmadaisOmadais3 päivää sitten
  • Back to the moon? 😅

    The Bloody TruthThe Bloody Truth3 päivää sitten
  • Comment for algorithm.

    Ciorram1Ciorram13 päivää sitten
  • I confess, Mr. Ottinger make me laugh a few times. What a great man

    Leandro GogolaLeandro Gogola3 päivää sitten
  • 1:45 when the impostor is sus

    Dadly25Dadly253 päivää sitten
    • I knew there'd be at least one lol

      Ron BurghandyRon Burghandy11 tuntia sitten
  • Destin, I have a friend who has an LLTV sitting in his shed at work. I was fortunate enough to get a tour of his "work" and I can honestly say as much fun as it looks... yeah, no... His work is the same AFRC mentioned in your video. I was most impressed by the Peroxide thrusters mounted on every corner and axis of the unit. A tour of the Armstrong facility was the most incredible thing I have had the opportunity to experience. if you are ever there ask about the LLTV and perhaps they can take you to the closet for a look see. God Bless you man, I love your take on science.

    DavyBoySmithDavyBoySmith3 päivää sitten
  • We aren’t going back to the moon, not with lunchbox Joe in power.

    Egon PaxEgon Pax3 päivää sitten
  • Everybody know Apollo is a big lie

    gordonfree mangordonfree man3 päivää sitten
    • Wrong

      AtlasAtlas3 päivää sitten
  • AMONG US!!! HE SAID IT

    Binky CarolinaBinky Carolina3 päivää sitten
  • @ 5:45 ---> food for thought, the Harrier Jump Jet was first tested in 1967 and introduced into service in '69... 😉

    John BravoJohn Bravo3 päivää sitten
  • Why not installing a helium baloon, that lifts 5/6 of the lander's weight?

    Florian WalterFlorian Walter3 päivää sitten
  • at this point this man knows too much to be safe 🙏😂

    Super SongSuper Song3 päivää sitten
  • Where is the loud roar of the rocket when you hear them calmly talking as lunar is landing?

    Ryan RichRyan Rich3 päivää sitten
    • @Atlas nms was tight

      Ryan RichRyan Rich3 päivää sitten
    • It's a pressure fed engine firing in a vacuum, come on.

      AtlasAtlas3 päivää sitten
  • I would assume the lander's computer will perform the descent and landing in Artemis program.

    HirvieläinHirvieläin3 päivää sitten
  • Why do we need manual landing when we sent multiple rovers to mars and it has ability to auto land with high precision

    Suphakrit PhantharatSuphakrit Phantharat3 päivää sitten
  • 15:55 oh my ghaad

    Bogdan BogdanBogdan Bogdan3 päivää sitten
  • 1:45 kinda sus....

    Bread SpreaderBread Spreader3 päivää sitten
  • They actually planned on hitting the moon harder, the crunch pistons on the legs didn't get crunched all the way, that's why their steps are more awkward than usual, edit, because the ladder was hooked on the leg

    PatarPatar3 päivää sitten
  • Hahaha cant wait til you debunk it by looking into it :)

    Rooster OriginalRooster Original3 päivää sitten
    • @DrCash7 there really isn't

      AtlasAtlas2 päivää sitten
    • @Atlas nOtHinG to DeBuNK heRe FolKS

      DrCash7DrCash72 päivää sitten
    • There's nothing to debunk.

      AtlasAtlas3 päivää sitten
  • How? miniatures and a sound stage...

    britshellbritshell3 päivää sitten
  • That was fascinating! Very few people are qualified to call Neil Armstrong an idiot! lol

    mikencomikenco3 päivää sitten
  • I think what you're saying, that we need to learn about *why* decisions were made, is really the root of the "teach a man to fish" adage, and it's such a huge issue with the way I see things being taught. Don't give people the answer, give people the tools to find the answer.

    The InternetThe Internet3 päivää sitten
  • Folks at NASA are probably taking notes rn.

    Phineas GPhineas G3 päivää sitten
  • Why does the velocity have to be zero upon landing? Why not near zero?

    Black PantherBlack Panther4 päivää sitten
  • You're making it too easy for tomorrow's kids, they will look like geniuses but instead it was all on youtube.

    LavalambtronLavalambtron4 päivää sitten
    • The power of technology.

      Some OnesSome Ones3 päivää sitten
  • never went to the moon brah. hash tag moon landing hoax

    Laura WhiteLaura White4 päivää sitten
    • @Laura White I have better things to do than watch conspiracy videos. That said, I never came across a good hoaxer argument.

      AtlasAtlas4 päivää sitten
    • Atlas gee what a convincing retort Atlas. See “American Moon” on YT and then try to tell me it’s not possible that something’s up with the official narrative.

      Laura WhiteLaura White4 päivää sitten
    • wrong

      AtlasAtlas4 päivää sitten
  • You are truly a treasure! I so appreciate all of your videos, they are some of the most wholesome and informative media out there.

    David MadsenDavid Madsen4 päivää sitten
  • 1:58

    Ian ThorntonIan Thornton4 päivää sitten
  • 1:58 amongus

    AsophosAsophos4 päivää sitten
    • 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

      Some OnesSome Ones3 päivää sitten
  • 1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

    WyrylkaWyrylka4 päivää sitten
    • Kinda sus

      BearsBears3 päivää sitten
  • 1:45

    Aidan GavinAidan Gavin4 päivää sitten
  • Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

    Konnies EggKonnies Egg4 päivää sitten
  • Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

    goutvols103goutvols1034 päivää sitten
  • I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

    Carl CarterCarl Carter4 päivää sitten
  • There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

    The Obsolete ManThe Obsolete Man4 päivää sitten
  • U said among us a lot

    Traci WagnonTraci Wagnon5 päivää sitten
  • Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

    lungoteverelungotevere5 päivää sitten
  • 1:59 among us

    Tampa BlushTampa Blush5 päivää sitten
  • 1:45 amongus

    Tampa BlushTampa Blush5 päivää sitten
  • 1:45

    Jeremy HopkinsJeremy Hopkins5 päivää sitten
  • Boots on the moon.

    Bradyn AustinBradyn Austin5 päivää sitten
  • 1:45 , 1:59

    JPazerJPazer5 päivää sitten
  • 1:45

    JPazerJPazer5 päivää sitten
  • Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

    Derrick FyffeDerrick Fyffe5 päivää sitten
    • The delay is because of the finite speed of light. There's nothing that can be done about that.

      AtlasAtlas4 päivää sitten
  • Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

    Chinmoy KatharChinmoy Kathar5 päivää sitten
  • I WANNA SEE THIS CARTOON! MAKE IT HAPEN!

    Travis WeideTravis Weide5 päivää sitten
  • What a brilliant video. Thank you.

    Peter HoarePeter Hoare5 päivää sitten
  • I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

    Sadrho GollsodiaSadrho Gollsodia5 päivää sitten
  • Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

    Mac KettnerMac Kettner5 päivää sitten
  • Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

    curtuswcurtusw5 päivää sitten
  • Thanks, dude.

    JustJoe OlesonJustJoe Oleson5 päivää sitten
  • 1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

    D. SkučasD. Skučas5 päivää sitten
    • spooky

      AtlasAtlas5 päivää sitten
  • Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

    Dick RigglesDick Riggles5 päivää sitten
    • Ha! You’re an ignorant moron. You know NOTHING about the engineering involved.

      Brad WooldidgeBrad Wooldidge5 päivää sitten
    • Hate to break it to you but you are an idiot.

      Kyle LaurentKyle Laurent5 päivää sitten
    • @Atlas Seriously, do some thinking and use logic...

      Dick RigglesDick Riggles5 päivää sitten
    • Wrong.

      AtlasAtlas5 päivää sitten
  • Man I'm excited for this series!

    Bastian NyströmBastian Nyström5 päivää sitten
  • tgagyg

    W BixW Bix5 päivää sitten
  • This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

    Nate ShanksNate Shanks5 päivää sitten
  • I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

    Patrick RudolphPatrick Rudolph5 päivää sitten
  • 1:58

    DeltaBravoDeltaBravo5 päivää sitten
  • WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON .. OR SPACE AT ALL. GOD IS REAL AND THE EARTH IS FLAT.

    TP ProductionsTP Productions5 päivää sitten
    • Troller alert :|

      Some OnesSome Ones3 päivää sitten
    • Troll.

      Brad WooldidgeBrad Wooldidge5 päivää sitten
    • fool spotted

      SkippySkippy5 päivää sitten
    • ****IDIOT ALERT****

      Kyle LaurentKyle Laurent5 päivää sitten